Pay the Farmers Now


My colleagues and I have just published a new study in Nature Sustainability that provides a detailed overview of water use and its implications in the US, with a focus on the West.

Unsurprisingly, media coverage of this story is focusing on the gee-whiz statistics (and yes, they are eye-popping) and the negative impacts associated with water over-use in the West. But my co-authors and I don’t want you to miss the real punchline of this story: There is a clear, immediately-available, well-proven option available to stave off catastrophic water crises in the West, it’s quite affordable, and there are thousands of farmers and ranchers ready and willing to implement it —>> pay farmers to temporarily fallow some portion of their farmland.

I know the farmers are ready because I’ve spent time with them on the ground. They aren’t expecting to get rich off this water crisis, they just want to be properly compensated for being solution providers. But obstructionists are confusing them with doomsday stories and warning of mythological boogeymen, saying they’ll lose their water rights or destroy their communities. It just ain’t so. In this fleeting moment, farmers are in the driver’s seat and can call the shots that will protect them and guide their destinies. But if they let the emerging water shortage crises explode, they will lose that control.

For the sake of rural western landscapes, families and communities, I hope they will seize this opportunity while they have it.

OK, here’s the stats:

  • One-third of all water consumed in the western U.S. goes to irrigate cattle-feed crops, primarily alfalfa and grass hay; in the Colorado River basin, it’s 55%.

Image: Irrigated hay fields along the Bighorn River in Montana. Photo by Brian Richter
  • Beef and dairy production is the leading driver of water scarcity in the West. In the Colorado River basin, it is the biggest water use by far and therefore the leading cause of plummeting reservoir levels and imminent water shortages.
  • During droughts, one-fourth of all western rivers are nearly dried up by water consumption for human purposes, and irrigation of cattle feeds is the largest water user in more than half of these heavily depleted rivers.
  • The drying of rivers due to cattle-feed irrigation has greatly elevated the risk of extinction for more than 50 fish species and has adversely impacted many others.
  • Los Angeles, Portland, Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle are the leading consumption centers for beef produced with western river water.
  • We found that the voluntary, temporary fallowing of cattle-feed crops could substantially lower the risk of water shortages across the West. Farmers volunteering to be compensated in return for fallowing can expect enhanced income by “growing water” alongside their crop production. To alleviate water scarcity In the Colorado River basin, if the cost of compensating farmers were to be shared among the 40 million people using river water, the estimated cost would be $10-15 per person annually.

In our paper we acknowledge that fallowing isn’t the only way to save water on irrigated farms. We should also invest in other water-saving measures including installation of improved irrigation equipment, rebuilding soil health, and switching to less water-intensive crops. But those alternatives and transitions all require a good bit of time and investment of capital. In the meantime, we need to bring our rivers back to life, and temporary fallowing is the best way to do that.

Image: Cattle grazing along the North Platte River in Wyoming. Photo by Brian Richter

2 Responses

  1. Paying farmers for water they don’t own , farmers who knew their expanded water use was unsustainable when they did the new plantings and herd expansions, is American Socialism. American socialism is in place for certain groups (bankers, farmers, ranchers and billionaires) but not (very much) for the common man. I say socialism for all or socialism for none. Taxpayers should not be made to subsidize rich farmers and ranchers.

    1. Brian Richter

      In legal terms, the farmers do “own” the right to use water – it’s a recognized property right under the prevailing water rights system in the West. Those water rights for farming were established a very long time ago, in many cases longer than 100 years ago. While some may want to see the water used in a different way, the rights to use water can’t be taken without appropriate compensation. Water scarcity in the West did not begin with farmers; it emerged as cities and industries expanded to the point where-when added on top of the original uses of the water for farming-the available water supplies became fully exhausted. I’d argue that it is therefore the responsibility of those that came later, e.g., the cities and industries, to ‘fix’ this problem by incentivizing farmers to use less water.

Leave a Reply